[ad_1]
In prisoners on April 15, 2025 in Seattle, Washington, a plane at King County International Airport, which was chartered by the US immigration and customs authority (ICE) at King County International Airport. Semi-regular flights with prisoners go through the airport, while the Trump administration continues to plan the expansion of the detention and deportation of immigrants.
David Ryder/Getty Images
Hide the caption
Switch the image signature
David Ryder/Getty Images
NGOC Phan prepared that her husband was deported to Vietnam.
The 40 -year -old Phan, this spring, had collected luggage with clothes and a cell phone in her house south of Seattle. Her husband filled out paperwork and travel documents, she said. The family abroad prepared to welcome him at the airport. And in a few years she would join him to found a brand new life together.
“Everything that was done up to this point, my communication with his [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] Officer, he filled out this explanatory form and provided names of people to pick it up at the airport – there was no indication that he would be sent somewhere else apart from Vietnam, “Phan told NPR.
The deportation itself was no surprise. Her husband Tuan Thanh Phan had convicted about a 25-year prison sentence First murder And attack in the second degree in 2000 after firing a weapon that hit a spectator during a gang dispute. He was a Green Card owner, whose lawful permanent stay was revoked during his prison 2009, his wife said.
He never went free. The ICE officers took off the Coyote Ridge Corrections Center in Connell, Washington on March 3, and immediately inserted it into the deportation process.
“We accepted it. We planned it and were looking forward to it,” said Ngoc Phan. “And then they took it off in the middle of the night and sent him to South Sudan.”
Phan’s husband was one of several men who were first communicated that they were sent to South Africa instead of their home countries – including Mexico, Burma, Cuba and Laos. Then they were informed that their destination would be South Sudan, a politically unstable country in Africa and one of the poorest in the world.
The government argues that the men’s home countries will not take them – and people with criminal records should not be allowed to stay in the United States
“As a career-Ice officer, I have had to deal with these unruly countries for years to released repeated murderers, sex offenders and violent criminals to the USA because their home countries would not take them back,” said the acting director of ICE, Todd Lyons, during a press conference.
“We are now able to remove these threats to public security control so that they will no longer be victims to the municipality and will no longer have victims in the United States.”
But immigration lawyers sued South Sudan during the flight and argued that their clients hadn’t had enough time to deny their deportations there. The same lawyers had sued at the beginning of this month to stop a deportation flight to Libya, another unstable country with an infamous history of poor treatment towards migrants.
Brian Murphy, a federal judge in Massachusetts, who was appointed the bank by President Joe Biden, decided in her favor and argued that migrants should be deported to somewhere where she is not her country of origin to have more time to contest her distance.
In particular, migrants should receive an interview that is known as a credible Fear interview in which they have the chance to say that they may be exposed to violence or persecution if they are sent to a certain country.
“Is it okay for the government to turn around and destroy your life and life of your families just because these people committed a crime for which they have already been convicted, have you already served your prison sentence?” Said Matt Adams, the legal director of the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, one of the groups that the administration sued in South Sudan during the flight, and deportations to other so -called third countries.
“It’s just a complete waiver of our judicial system,” he said.
Expansion of the use of deportations of the third country
The strategy of relying on other countries to record the US deportees is not new.
For example, Mexico was an earlier goal to remove those who cannot be brought back to their home countries. This is because countries such as Cuba and Venezuela, for example, did not accept deported from the US countries for many years.
Vietnam, Tuan Thanh Phans at home, was also on the list of countries with limits When accepting deported. The country has signed An agreement with the USA in 2020 This made it easier to accept those who arrived in the USA before 1995. Phan arrived in 1991, said his lawyer Adams from Northwest Immigrant Rights Project.
The Trump government has priority to make more countries to repatriate their citizens, also from China, Venezuela and Cuba.
Nevertheless, there may be obstacles to send people to their countries of origin.
Officials from the homeland protection department justified the flight to South Sudan by arguing that the men’s home countries would not accept them due to the crimes they had committed in the United States, including murder and sexual assault.
“These are those who do not want in their community. These are those that we prioritize every day,” said Lyons from ICE. He noticed that the Foreign Ministry was the key to the imparting of international business with countries to play this role.
“And the further away, the better, so you can’t return across the border” said during a cabinet in April in April.
It is unclear whether the government tried for the first time to deport some of the men in Dschibuti to their home countries.
ICE did not answer questions whether Mexico and Vietnam, the home countries of two of the men who limit deportations, whether only people had been included in this special flight who had entered without legal status or how many people have been sent from DHS since the administration of DHS.
“We do not comment on private diplomatic discussions about the removal of a certain individual or end goal,” said a spokesman for the Foreign Ministry.
The Vietnamese message did not answer a request for a comment.
“Credible fear” claims
Greg Chen, Senior Director of Government Relations at the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said the difference to previous administrations includes the type of countries with which this white house negotiates.
“The law is that it must be a safe country so that this person can be removed there,” said Chen, whose impartial organization represents immigration lawyers and law students.
The Department of Homeland Security has not commented on the conditions in South Sudan. But the Travel advice from the Foreign Ministry Because it warns the US citizens not to travel there because “crimes, kidnapping and armed conflicts”.
The DHS directive requires every deporter in which country they are sent “and an opportunity for a quick demonstration of a claimed fear of being tortured there”.
The arguments in court have focused on how long migrants have to deny their distance to a country. DHS says that this process takes “minutes”, not weeks.
In the case of the flight to South Sudan, the men received less than 24 hours.
Immigration lawyers say that so little time means that the deportees have little hope of arguing for a distance, especially if they do not speak English.
And ultimately, the lawyers of immigration say that the government makes mistakes.
“The fact that these deportations take place in an excessive manner means that in these cases the administration violates dangerously close to violating a proper procedure,” said Chen.
The fight continues in court
Judge Murphy von Massachusetts did not prohibit the use of third -party conversions. However, he said that the government had to dismiss in the language of the deporter and for 15 days to contest its circulation to a certain country – something that did not happen in the case of flight to South Sudan, said Murphy.
After completing the flight, Murphy ordered that the men remain in DHS -care, while the department carries out a credible fear assessment.
The flight landed on a military base in Dschibuti, where men and federal agents have remained since May 22, while the administration is fighting against the orders.
The Trump administration appealed against Murphy’s command to the Supreme Court and argued that the judge had the role of the executive to carry out immigration policy and conduct international business.
“After these alien literally banged on the brakes in the middle of flight and forced the government to capture them on a military base in Dschibuti that are not designed in such a way that they hold such criminals, retrospectively has its interdetermined disposal of an additional sentence and any procedure for DHS” John Sauer “, the US general, the US American, the US American General Statitor. said in the appeal procedure.
“While certain extraterrestrials may benefit from the stable of their distance, the nation is not worse. Worse, which has an injunction – and will harm – American foreign policy and national security,” added Sauer.
The Supreme Court gave the lawyers who represented the men until June 4 to react to the appeal. The government will then get another chance to answer before the Supreme Court rejects.
Until then, the men and immigration officers remain in Dschibuti.
Phan says her husband called her from the internment camp every morning. Now she hasn’t heard of him since his plane.
It is frustrated that the administration arrives in others who may have entered the country without legal status and have committed several crimes.
“I’m angry about it,” said Phan. “You want to call him a barbaric monster without really understanding the details of his case … he [already] did 25 years. “