On the anniversary of his silent money conviction, Trump continues to fight criminal proceedings

On the anniversary of his silent money conviction, Trump continues to fight criminal proceedings

[ad_1]

A jury of 12 New York Donald Trump condemned a year ago because they fake annual reports as part of a suspected Hush money scheme to influence the 2016 elections.

The conviction left Trump indelibly – and made him the first president or former president who was found guilty of crime – and his struggle to extinguish that the legacy continues to this day.

On June 11, a federal appellate court in Manhattan is to hear oral arguments in the new legal struggle of the President in order to move his criminal proceedings from the state to the federal court.

Alvin Bragg, District Prosecutor of Manhattan, rejects the step and argues that a case after the conviction cannot be forwarded before the Federal Supreme Court -but Trump’s lawyers have argued that the “unprecedented prosecution of a former and current president of the United States belongs before the Federal Court”.

Trump was found guilty of 34 crimes after the prosecutors claimed that he had involved a “program” to increase his opportunities during the 2016 presidential elections through a number of HUSH money payments to the adult film actress Stormy Daniels and the forgery of New York business documents in order to cover up this suspected criminal behavior.

Ten days before Trump was sworn in as President last November, the New York judge Juan Merchan sentenced him to unconditional dismissal – without prison, fines or probation – that it was the “only rightful prison sentence” to prevent “the highest office in the country”.

“I won the choice in a massive landslide and understand the people in this country what’s going on. This was a government weapon,” Trump told the court during his conviction.

Photo: The elected President of New York was a judge Juan Merchan sentences Donald Trump when he appeared from a distance in addition to his lawyer Todd Blanche in the New York Criminal Court in New York City on January 10, 2025.

The elected President of New York State judges Juan Merchan sentences, Donald Trump, when he, alongside his lawyer Todd Blanche from afar, as prosecutor Joshua Steinglass on January 10, 2025 to hear a negotiation.

Jane Rosenberg/Reuters

Trump continues to deny misconduct, and his lawyers have argued that his condemnation based on evidence and statements that related to his official actions as president, including social media post from his official Twitter account as president and statement by his former communication director Hope Hicks.

The trial found a pioneering judgment a month before the Supreme Court, which expanded the scope of the immunity of the president, and Trump’s lawyers argued that the evidence would not have been permitted due to the judgment of the High Court.

Trump’s lawyers tried to use this argument before Trump’s conviction of Trump, but the argument was rejected by judge Juan Merchan, two New York appeal courts and the Supreme Court.

“The alleged violations of evidence against the chosen Presidential Trump court proceedings can be tackled in the ordinary appointment course,” said the Supreme Court in a short, non-signed statement, although four judges said they had granted Trump’s application.

For Trump’s criminal defense, he was based on the then defense lawyers Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, who now act as deputy attorney in general and deputy attorney in general. At the beginning of this week, Trump announced that BOVE, who led a cleaning of the professional law enforcement officers before the Senate confirmed its nomination to lead the DOJ – before the United States Court of Appeal for the 3rd Circulation.

With his former defenders who were now working for the government, Trump typed the law firm Elite Manhattan from Sullivan in early this year & Cromwell to cope with his criminal appeal.

The lawyers of the Ministry of Justice also submitted an Amicus letter this week to argue that the case should be negotiated and ejected by a federal court because the judgment of the jury was based on evidence that was covered by the president’s immunity.

“The defense of President Trump actually has the form of a new constitutional immunity, which was announced by the Supreme Court at the end of his procedure, instead of a new law that was issued by the congress, if something is reduced in favor of the President,” argued the lawyers of the Ministry of Justice in a letter set up on Tuesday.

The appeals and the persistent calling of Trump’s $ 83 million rating in the civil proceedings by E. Jean Carroll and the case of citizens’ fraud in half a billion dollar procedure for unknown legal reasons, while Trump has the power of presidency in his defense. He described the prosecutors who pursued the cases against him as politically motivated and advertised his election victory as a political acquittal last November.

“The real judgment will be of November 5,” said Trump reporters when he left the court after his conviction last year. “And they know what happened here and everyone knows what happened here.”

Claim Here Your Rewards

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Review Your Cart
0
Add Coupon Code
Subtotal