[ad_1]
Prime Minister Narendra Modi said that India had “only held” his military measures against Pakistan in his first speech before the nation after a violent military confrontation in his first speech last week, which threatened a fifth all-out war between nuclear.
On Wednesday, the ultra -nationalist Hindu leader in Neu -Delhi said that his government would not distinguish between governments that support “terrorism” and “terrorist groups”. He said India would “retaliate himself on his own conditions” if there is a future “terror” attack on the country.
The Indian military launched several rocket attacks in Pakistan and Pakistan-released cashmere on May 6th and claimed that “terrorist infrastructure” had hit.
Pakistan rejected this claim.
Pakistan decided to “attack” India instead of fighting terrorism, Modi said and claimed that his country would not “tolerate nuclear pressing”.
“We will monitor every step of Pakistan,” added Modi and said: “This is not a era of the war, but this is not a era of terrorism either.”
Modi turned to the Indus water contract with Pakistan and said: “Terror and trade cannot go together, water and blood cannot flow together.”
The contract mediated by the World Bank has long survived several crises between the two competitors. India’s most recent decision to stop the water flow, however, signals a sharp diplomatic shift with water, which Pakistan rely on as a lever for agricultural and civilian purposes.
In an interview with the Reuters news agency, the Pakistani finance minister said on Monday that the Indus water contract, which is one -sided by India, “must be attributed to where it was”.
On Monday, Donald Trump, President of the United States, claimed that his government had prevented “a nuclear conflict” through the help of conveying the ceasefire.
New-Delhi blamed Islamabad for a fatal attack on April 22nd on tourists in the Indian cashmere in Pahalgam, in which 26 people were killed-a Pakistan is emphasized.
According to their partial counts, the fighting has killed around 60 civilians on both sides since last week.
Indian and Pakistani military to check the ceasefire
India and Pakistani military commanders were expected to rethink a recently mediated ceasefire contract on Monday evening.
The Indian army previously reported on a “quiet night” when the authorities said that the night was peacefully over controversial cashmere and the international border without new incidents being reported.
A high -ranking Indian defense officer confirmed that the talks that were originally planned for the local period were later pushed to the parts a day. The discussions, according to analysts, will probably focus on technical details to prevent future flare-ups instead of designing long-term guidelines.
Abdul Basit, a South Asia specialist at Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore, said that the purpose of the exchange was to establish clear lines and avoid misconceptions.
“The goal is to avoid miscalculations, since a spark can quickly move to a nuclear catastrophe,” said Basit of the AFP news agency.
The increase in hostility has had the most serious confrontation between the nuclear neighbors since her last declared conflict in 1999.
When the tensions cooled down, the Indian authorities opened 32 airports on Monday that were closed due to the fights.
Both sides claim victory
The civilians in Kashmir suffered the most in the crossfire.
The military leaders in both countries spent on Sunday to hand over the pointed briefings, claiming they had won the promise of restraint.
“We made the promise that we made our people,” said Pakistani military spokesman Leutnant Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry and described the latest operation as a “success on the battlefield”.
Air Vice Marschall Aurangzeb Ahmed added that Pakistan had “restored the deterrent and neutralized the key threats”.
The lieutenant general India, Rajiv Ghai, insisted that his country had shown “immense reluctance”, warned: “Every threat to the sovereignty, territorial integrity and security of our citizens is encountered on decisive violence.”
Despite the temporary calm, both nations remain on alert, since the world observes the signs of a permanent de -escalation or irritation of the hostility.